On the other hand, Megyn Kelly is seen by 'most impartial pundits' to be somewhere to the right of Atila the Hun.
It's rare to find an impartial blogsite when it comes to American politics. I'm looking at your list on the right here - 'Why we need John McCain...', 'Protesting Barack Obama', 'If he tries to fool with my Biretta...', 'Obama is an abortion rights extremist', and best of all 'Is Sarah Palin America's Princess Di?' (no, by the way, she's not).
I'm still looking.

Good choice, Lenox, continuing to look, that is.

No, Freedom's Zone is not a left-leaning blog, and, as you noticed, indeed it is center-right - which is the common sense side of the political equation.

And no, I'm not familiar with anyone actually believing Sarah Palin is America's Princess Di, unless, of course, you're talking about her popularity with the base.

As for needing John McCain over Barack Obama, in a heart beat - although he's far and away not my first choice. Ronald Reagan isn't running.

Obama, abortion rights extremist? If he isn't, one doesn't exist.

An open letter to Hubert T. Lacroix
President of the Canadian Braodcasting Corporation

Dear Sir;
As a long time and sometimes vocal supporter of the CBC in its past problems with the CRTC, ( http://www.crtc.gc.ca/Eng/transcripts/1999/tb0316a.htm ) and a Canadian living in the USA; I find Heather Mallick's rant "Mighty wind blows through Republican Convention" (attached below) offensive and worse that tabloid gibberish. I find it inconceivable that the editorial standards of the once proud Canadian Broadcasting Corporation declined below that of the National Inquirer. In fact I would challenge you to read any Inquirer story in contradistinction to Ms Mallick's sub-tabloid journalistic style; The Inquirer story would quote sources of information, use correct English and never stoop to profane language or the F___ word. Mallick only quotes two sources of minor relevance and begins her rant with the greatest journalistic faux pas "I assume".

Does this mean that Ms Mallick made an assumption on Senator McCain's reasons for choosing Governor Palin and that the rest of the information was gathered personally using the time tested journalistic creed of who what where when and why?

Ms Mallick seems quite well versed in the sexual inadequacies of Republican men; has she been, unbeknownst to the Canadian public, a latter day Mata Hari in the employ of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) bedding republican men for pillow talk secrets? Does this also mean that Ms Mallick has spied on the alleged secret meetings and had extensive hands on experience regarding their irresponsibility with semen while postponing household repairs?

Ms Mallick's admitted feminist stance has to leave one wondering where she and alleged other women receive their so called resentment training for nursing terrible hatred towards each other? From the amount of testosterone (even promoting firearm violence towards Levi Johnson) flowing through her vitriolic attack on governor Palin, saying she really isn't female, can the question be asked; Does Ms Mallick have a severe case of Vagina envy?

Ms Mallick must surely be a legend in her own mind to believe that these alleged other women can suppress the learned same sex hatred through self flagellation and reading her trashy column.

Ms Mallick allows that "(john) Doyle's job includes watching a lot of reality television". Does this mean her statement "(governor) Palin has a toned-down version of the porn actress look favored by this decade's woman" comes from extensive first hand experience of watching films of that genre?

From attacks on Governor Palin's personal appearance and of her family, not once has Ms Mallick discussed the genuine pros or cons of the Republican Vice-presidential nominee vs. the Democratic nominee. Nor has she done any journalistic exposé regarding George Soros' financial manipulation of the Democratic nomination process that stole the nomination from Hillary Clinton.

Boiled down to its essence Ms Mallick's column is pure and simple hatred; hate mongering towards the Palin family, hatred for people she identifies as white trash, who she and Thomas Frank allow "vote Republican on social issues to give themselves the only self-esteem available to their broken, economically abused existence." It is elitist and condescending like a later day Marie Antoinette with Cake or Death; devoid of factual journalism.

Considering Canada has well honed anti Hate statutes, why has Ms Mallick not been summarily guillotined from her Canadian Taxpayer subsidized position with the CBC? Perhaps there is tacit agreement within the Marxist feminist hierarchy to which she reports as to her journalistic bent. Where is Mammy Yokum "good is better than evil because it's nicer" when you need her to wash Ms Mallick's mouth out with homemade lye soap or deliver a "Goodnight Irene Punch" to restore decency and integrity to the CBC, as you are not holding Ms Mallick to the same litmus test that you publicize for outside contributors. Listed Below

Desmond McGrath
A Newfoundland Patriot living in socioeconomic exile amongst the wonderful Cajuns of the southern USA.

Guidelines for Submissions to CBCNews.ca
Tell us your story, be a part of the news team. CBC.ca wants you to participate in online comments, video uploads and photo submissions.
COMMENTS
What kind of comments are suitable for CBC.ca?
We want your perspective. Probe, analyze, inform. Challenge, advocate, debate. Inspire, entertain, enjoy. Your contributions make our online publishing and on-air programming richer, the conversations more lively and diverse.

What is and isn't acceptable?
Please keep your submissions relevant to the topic.
Be civil.
We want to hear your own opinion. Please don't include lengthy excerpts from other posts.
When you are writing about legal issues, remember that people are innocent until proven guilty (that may mean using words such as "allegedly").
Please do not post press releases, commercial promotions or external web addresses.
Always avoid:
Racist, sexist and offensive language.
Personal attacks and defamatory statements.
Breaking copyright rules (that includes copying and pasting excepts from other sites without attribution)
Violating someone's privacy
Threats or suggesting committing a criminal act.
Insensitive comments regarding the death or injury of private individuals, especially children
Important note: If you violate any of these rules, then your comment will not be posted and your account may be suspended.

It is important to remember the issue at hand is not Ms Mallick's political stance, but the way she expressed her opinions and the arguments she used.

Many comments have criticized her being left-leaning. It is just fair for a news media to display right-leaning as well as left-leaning editorials. She has no fault to have her political stance, whether you agree or not.

The problem with Ms. Mallick, however, is that she attacked Governor Paulin based on her subjective take on her appearances. She went as far as to label her family members as 'rednecks' and 'roughnecks'. This has crossed the line to libel and hate speech.

In response, I've written an article. A parody of her column in a sense. It's titled "A Wind Blows Out of Heather Mallick's Ass". You can find it here: http://www.blables.com/article/?a=21