Aggregator • Hyscience • ID=78154
Daniel J. Mitchell writes at Cato:
President Obama imposed a big-spending faux stimulus program on the economy back in 2009, claiming that the government needed to squander about $800 billion to keep the unemployment rate from rising above 8 percent.
out? One possible description is that the so-called stimulus became a festering pile of manure. About three years have passed, and the joblessness rate hasn't dropped below 8 percent. But the White House has been sprinkling perfume on that pile of you-know-what and claiming that the Keynesian spending binge was good policy.
But not every politician is blindly ideological like Obama. Vitor Gaspar, Portugal's Finance Minister, is willing to admit error. Here are some relevant excerpts from a New York Times report.
Mr. Gaspar, speaking to The New York Times last week, has a message for observers who say Europe needs to substantially relax its austerity approach: We tried stimulus and it backfired. Like some other European countries, Portugal tried what Mr. Gaspar called "a Keynesian style expansion" in 2008, referring to a theory by economist John Maynard Keynes. But it didn't turn things around, and may have made things worse.Why does the Portuguese Finance Minister have this view? Well, for the simple reason that the economy got worse and more spending put his country in a deeper fiscal ditch.
The yield on Portuguese government bonds -- more than 11 percent on longer-term bonds -- is substantially higher than the yields on debt issued by Ireland, Spain or Italy. ... The main fear among investors is that Portugal is going to have to ask for a second bailout from the International Monetary Fund and the European Union, which committed $103 billion of financial aid in 2011.Maybe the big spenders in Portugal should import some of the statist bureaucrats at Congressional Budget Office. The CBO folks could then regurgitate the moving-goalposts argument that they've used in the United States and claim that the economy would be even weaker if the government hadn't wasted more money.
But perhaps the Portuguese left doesn't think that will pass the laugh test.Mitchell then points out that he made this point quite some time ago ... the Democrats should have paid attention to his video posted way back in Jan 2009 (:
Keynesian policies failed for Hoover and Roosevelt in the 1930s. So-called stimulus policies also failed for Japan in 1990s. And Keynesian proposals failed for Bush in 2001 and 2008.It's not rocket science ... and even politicians should be able to grasp the basic truth that Mitchell makes crystal clear and that should be common sense to most reality-based folks -- borrowing money from one group of people and giving it to another group of people does not increase prosperity.
Surely Barack Obama should know this because the left keeps telling us he's the smartest man on the planet ... so one can only rationally come to one of two conclusions: He either is aware of what his disastrous policies are doing to our economy and not only doesn't care because he wants to make America a much less prosperous country with substantially more debt than when he took office ... or his ideologically based class-warfare agenda of wealth-redistribution is far more important to him than the health and prosperity of our country.
So, which is it?... more